FORTUNATELY, some responsible scientists around the world are continuing to investigate the fallout from the global covid vaccination programme which delivered 13billion doses in total. Japanese scientists have completed a study of the effect of the jabs on Pancreatic Cancer (PC) patients in their hospital system, ‘Repeated COVID-19 Vaccination as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study’. The study is having a global impact; within a day of publication it had been downloaded 4,000 times.
The study begins with the obligatory homage to mRNA technology, damning it with faint praise as ’a significant technological advance’, which is a misrepresentation still necessary to ensure the paper’s acceptance for publication (yes, journals are still clinging on to the fantasy). It then plunges into the detailed story of cancer vulnerability. It examines the impact of covid vaccinations on the survival of 272 PC patients admitted to hospital between January 2018 and November 2023.
Pancreatic cancer is aggressive with a low survival rate (about 10-12 per cent after five years). It is often detected at a late stage when it is already invading nearby structures, eventually metastasising to other parts of the body. The Japanese study found that repeated covid booster vaccinations are associated with poorer overall survival in patients with PC: ‘Patient outcomes had improved each year by 2020; however, it began to deteriorate in 2021 and outcomes in 2022-2023 were significantly worse than those in 2018-2021.’
The authors investigated a possible mechanism and concluded: ‘Notably, our analysis reveals that high levels of IgG4 [an immune suppressant we have discussed in many previous reports including our Open Letter to Medical Professionals and Life Scientists induced by vaccination, correlate with a detrimental prognosis in these patients. These insights provide essential information regarding the interplay between vaccination and cancer progression, which has significant implications for patient management strategies. Our study highlights the necessity for ongoing research into the long-term effects of mRNA vaccinations on cancer prognosis, which remains a pressing concern in the evolving landscape of public health and cancer treatment.’
The complex statistical analysis involved detailed consideration and matching into groups for age, sex, comorbidities, treatment history, vaccination history, etc. Overall those vaccinated twice had a longer survival than those vaccinated three times (p=0.006). Microbiological testing found a reduced immune response in the three-times-vaxxed group compared with those vaxxed twice. The study did not examine outcomes for other cancer types. I leave this omission for your reflection.
The enduring mystery is why our health system is still recommending and encouraging mRNA covid vaccination. The release of this study follows dozens of others we have reported (see here for example) documenting serious adverse effects and higher death rates following mRNA vaccination. Yet on the same day as the study release, April 16, the World Health Organisation announced a legally binding agreement among its members on how to respond to future pandemics. Central to this agreement, which is set to be ratified in May, is the ‘sharing’ of drugs and vaccines between rich and poor nations. A better word than sharing might be proliferation.
How can it be that the world’s so-called medical experts have got it so wrong that they are still promoting a vaccination method which itself promotes cancer progression? The answer lies in a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of life. The discovery of DNA in 1953 has established a myth that the key to life has been discovered and nothing much more needs to be said about life’s abstract basis. This has shifted the focus of medical research on to a programme of editing DNA and then measuring what happens. An essentially destructive approach to life.
The deeper import of the discovery of DNA has somehow escaped the field of biotechnology. DNA is the physiological mechanism by which life perpetuates itself. Simply put, ‘the nature of life is to grow’. Any process of editing DNA will try to perpetuate itself – almost the definition of cancer. The immune system is dedicated to defending the unique characteristics of an individual’s DNA. It corrects accidental mutations trillions of times every 24 hours. Given this situation, those researching DNA set themselves to solve the ‘problem(???)’ of how to defend their edits from being rejected by the immune system. In other words, how to give their edited version of DNA a chance to grow. To do so, they have experimented with means to evade or shut down natural immune responses (see here for more discussion). Again we arrive at the door of cancer.
A study published in the Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, ‘Expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in cerebral Arteries: Implications for hemorrhagic stroke Post-mRNA vaccination’ confirms just how successful they have been in perpetuating their rogue genetic edits. This study found the presence of covid spike protein in the cerebral arteries of almost half of female stroke victims up to 17 months post vaccination. This was accompanied by evidence of inflammatory cell infiltration. This finding reinforces the results of other studies which have located persistent spike protein in different areas of the physiology. The implication is clear, covid vaccine genetic sequences appear effectively to interfere with the long-term genetic functioning of recipients.
Our cellular genetic system is remarkable. Every cell contains the whole genome, so the whole is contained in every part. Yet the whole is more than the sum of the parts. These principles of SCI apply not just to a single organism; each species has cellular DNA at its basis. Together, the world of millions of types of organisms form a WHOLE network. There is a constant mutual exchange of influence, information and nourishment going on in this vast network, all based on the structural yet also dynamic intelligence contained in cellular genetics. Order is present everywhere in the system. It is not random. The whole system is grounded in the underlying laws of nature investigated by physics, but crucially it is also an expression of the supreme intelligence personified in consciousness. Thus life is built up in layers on the ground of consciousness. The outer depends on inner.
The important thing to appreciate here is the wholesale assault on the order of natural law. As we have reported, the genetic engineering of our food sources (grains and vegetables), food processing (using genetically modified microorganisms), organisms (animals and insects), medical interventions and cosmetics is undermining the holistic order in nature and in our lives. All of these modified elements are, according to the nature of genetic systems, vying with one another to survive, grow and take over existing natural processes. They are doing so, not holistically based on millions of years of mutually beneficial evolution, but incoherently and destructively based on millions of man-made and computer generated DNA edits. This all points in one direction, genetic experimentation needs to stop. It has become a cancer rapidly growing throughout society and in the lives of individuals.
Very early on in the pandemic, eminent scientists such as Robert Malone warned about this obvious possibility or rather inevitability, but their warnings went unheeded. Worse, efforts were made to undermine their credibility and cancel their public platform. By this time, vast pandemic profits were in prospect. Money and influence was expended to ensure these were realised. Now the WHO agreement wants to set this prospect in concrete. It needs to be opposed. Fortunately the US has withdrawn its funding from WHO, an example we need to study very carefully. Our science policy needs to take account of scientific findings rather than ignore them.
Initially government advisers uncritically accepted the advice from the pharmaceutical and biotech industry that mass vaccination would be safe and effective. Then they made a fatal error; they deliberately ignored or discounted the millions of reports of adverse effects. This meant they had rejected one of the foundational principles of knowledge – personal experience. Nor had long-term safety been established, especially as gene therapy was known to have long-term consequences. This was glossed over. Again, with fatal consequences which are still unfolding.
Pandemic policy didn’t have the required breadth of evidence to pass as knowledge. We were told to trust the science, but it wasn’t science that was being offered to us. Pandemic policy became an exercise in ideology, authority, publicity and profit to the detriment of public health. It still is.
