First Amendment scholar from California is seeking Williamson County court records.
Image Credit: williamsoncounty-tn.gov
This story was originally published by the Nashville Banner. Sign up for their newsletter.
By Stephen Elliott, [The Nashville Banner, Creative Commons] –
Prominent legal scholar Eugene Volokh is challenging Tennessee law prohibiting out-of-state residents from accessing public records.
According to a suit filed in federal court on Tuesday, Volokh requested records from the Williamson County Circuit Court Clerk earlier this year. The clerk directed Volokh to the Williamson County Archives and Museum, which rejected the request because Volokh does not live in Tennessee.
Tennessee public records law has long vexed out-of-state requestors with its requirement that recipients be Tennessee citizens. The new complaint specifically targets restrictions on court records, not executive branch records that Tennessee governments also don’t provide to nonresidents.
Volokh told the Banner that he had come across a Tennessee Court of Appeals decision in the case, which stemmed from a political dispute in Williamson County.
“In order to understand the appellate decision, I thought I needed to see the trial court decision,” he said. “Now I want the trial court decision, and they’re not giving it to me. Of course, I’m trying to make a point here, but this originated from my just coming across this case, finding it interesting for my research, and wanting to get access to it.”
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled more than a decade ago that a similar provision in Virginia is constitutional.
“This Court has repeatedly made clear that there is no constitutional right to obtain all the information provided by [Freedom of Information Act] laws,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote then.
Volokh said that decision should not control his case because the ruling pertained to statutory, not constitutional, rights.
“I have a First Amendment right, I think, to access court records and to access them throughout the country,” he said. “That’s a constitutional right that I have, and if I’m right that I have this constitutional right, then I can’t be denied it because I’m not a Tennesseean.”
The restriction has continued to draw scrutiny. Last year, a conservative transparency coalition, including right-leaning groups with a Tennessee presence like the Beacon Center and Americans for Prosperity, urged Tennessee and other states to drop the provision from records law.
Volokh is a libertarian-leaning law professor and blogger who has authored textbooks and law review articles about the First Amendment. He lives in California and is represented by attorneys at Vanderbilt Law School’s Stanton First Amendment Clinic.
The complaint cites the U.S. Constitution’s Privileges and Immunities Clause, which Volokh’s lawyers argue prohibits states from treating residents of other states differently in the exercise of basic rights. Williamson County’s “denial of Mr. Volokh’s records request based on TPRA’s residency requirement imposes an impermissible barrier to Mr. Volokh’s ability to pursue his litigation and research — one that Tennessee residents do not face,” the complaint argues.
The plaintiff asks the court to declare that Williamson County’s enforcement of the TPRA is unconstitutional and to order the release of the records.
