FOLLOWING my recent interview on Amazing Academics with Professor Philip Davies, director of the Brunel Centre for Intelligence and Security Studies, in which I expressed my cynicism about the nature of the covid-19 ‘pandemic’, the lethality of the covid-19 virus and the ineffectiveness and harms from all the purported interventions, I shared it with a covid orthodox friend in the United States.
His response was to throw in the most scarlet of red herrings and ask me what I thought had ‘led to the excess deaths across the world during covid’. Where to begin, I thought. What about closing health services, warehousing vulnerable older people, excessive drinking (now attributed with excess deaths during the covid-19 years) and, of course, the worst intervention of all, the vaccines.
An incredible application of doublethink is applied by the covid orthodox when it comes to attributing anything untoward to the measures implemented in the name of preventing the spread of covid-19. The causal nexus is always referred to in the sense that we covid sceptics are wrong to jump to conclusions about the link between any of the interventions, such as the mRNA vaccines, and observed harms. Strangely, they easily apply the causal nexus in their favour when it comes to ascribing harm to covid-19.
To be fair, and those of us on the covid sceptic spectrum tend to be a great deal fairer and forgiving than our opponents, it is sometimes hard to offer strong evidence of the link. But it strikes me that we have a veritable ‘slam dunk’ with some data presented on the link between the introduction of the covid-19 vaccines and the increased consumption of cardiac medication in young people.
The data, taken from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health and published by Jarle Aarstad on his Substack show a 20 per cent increase in the use of cardiac medication from 2020 to 2024. The covid-19 vaccines were introduced in 2020. Prior to 2020 the number of people in the age group studied (15-44) was under 49 per 1,000. By 2024 it was over 59 per 1,000.
Aarstad, who has been at pains to demonstrate the link between covid-19 vaccines and excess mortality for some time, is a Professor at the Western Norway University of Applied Sciences. He is very well published and, while his academic area of research is within the Business School, the research methods he uses, statistics and network analysis, are well suited to studying phenomena such as the covid-19 ‘pandemic’ and subsequent measures. In that respect, he is especially well published.
Readers of TCW will not be surprised to hear that, to date, this striking evidence for the link between the introduction of the covid-19 vaccines and the increase in what is, surely, a key proxy for cardiac morbidity, cardiac medication, is yet to be picked up by Global Health Now, CIDRAP, Medscape or any of our usual sources. I imagine, however, any day now they will be all over this one.
One could be forgiven for thinking that emerging evidence as strong as that presented by Jarle Aarstad would be another nail in the coffin of the covid-19 vaccines. But evidence to date, with the single and yet officially unexplained withdrawal of the AstraZeneca version, there has been remarkably little dampening of enthusiasm for covid-19 vaccines among the public health brigade.
Far from it. Such is their determination to get covid-19 vaccines into our systems that they are trying to piggyback them on the seasonal flu vaccines. Only RFK in the United States has had the perspicacity to halt the rollout of some of the covid-19 vaccines. With evidence such as Aarstad’s, he should go further. It is infuriating that the Big Pharma industrial complex is making billions rolling out virtually useless covid-19 vaccines while simultaneously making further billions from the sales of expensive cardiac medications required to manage the harmful side-effects. It is almost as if they planned it.
Where evidence is cherry-picked to fit political narratives, and pharmaceutical interests exert excessive influence on public health policy, it is imperative that we challenge the prevailing orthodoxy. History has shown, the cost of unquestioning compliance is often measured not in headlines, but in human lives.
