THE UK’s drugs watchdog officials have refused to release data they collected in 2021, detailing adverse events suffered by pregnant women injected with covid vaccinations. Inexplicably, they claim it is not in the public interest, and all freedom of information requests to access full data have been denied.
Pregnant women were invited to take covid vaccines just two months into the vaccine rollout, before any of the manufacturers had begun trials in pregnant women, and before any had released reproductive toxicology reports. Pfizer were transparent in their lack of knowledge and their package insert read: ‘Available data on Comirnaty administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy.’ Pfizer ended their trials in 4,000 pregnant women in July 2022, and have yet to publish the data.
Doctors began noticing serious adverse events in pregnant women and by the end of 2022, 66 doctors, scientists and clinical practitioners submitted an open letter to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), the Royal College of Midwives (RCM) and the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) calling for ‘a halt in covid vaccination over serious safety concerns’. The authorities’ silence was deafening, and the vaccine juggernaut rumbled on.
Two systems were set up to collect adverse reaction information from pregnant women at the end of 2020. One in the UK, by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), a proactive rather than passive programme unlike the Yellow Card Scheme, called the Yellow Card Vaccine Monitor (YCVM), and another called the V-safe app in the US. V-safe also refused to release their data on pregnant women but were forced to comply after the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) took them to court. The final data set released in January details women reporting miscarriages and stillbirths, unsure whether the events were vaccine-related. One said: ‘Undiagnosed hives from head to toe Yeast infection Miscarriage’. Another said: ‘stillbirth at 22 weeks and 5 days’.
Over 30,000 people registered for the YCVM, and over 2,000 were pregnant women. MHRA’s CEO at the time was Dame June Raine. She mentioned the group of mothers-to-be at a public lecture in November 2022 but kept vital data from them secret.
It took two freedom of information requests, the first submitted by retired civil servant Nick Hunt, the second by pharmaceutical industry sales representative training expert Cheryl Grainger, to get any information at all and then it was partly redacted. Two further requests from Ms Grainger for full disclosure were refused on appeal by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), despite compelling evidence presented by mathematician Norman Fenton, Emeritus Professor of Risk and Information Management at Queen Mary University of London. The ICO worried that ‘limitations of the data provided could lead to misinterpretation, which could in turn lead to unnecessary concern on the safety of vaccination within a vulnerable population’. In other words, we are too stupid to understand the signals, and the vaccination programme – not those being vaccinated – must be protected at all costs.
The MHRA did release a preprint that lacked detail; its contents are alarming especially as the information has been available since August 2021, and ignored.
It detailed 1,366 pregnant women registered in the YCVM. Those who received the AstraZeneca vaccine experienced most adverse events (ADR), with 66 per cent (124 out of 203) reporting at least one ADR; 38 per cent of the Pfizer recipients and 61 per cent of Moderna recipients also reported at least one ADR.
The report gave minimal information on pregnancy outcomes as only six births had been recorded by the end of June 2021, but the AstraZeneca covid vaccine was quietly withdrawn.
The numbers were shared with the Commission on Human Medicines (CHM), who advise ministers on drug safety, and the Pharmacovigilance Expert Advisory Group (PEAG) who report problems to the CHM. It seems clear that the vaccination campaign should have been halted for pregnant women, but the drive continues to this day.
The MHRA still have no plans for full disclosure. They said: ‘Following peer-review, we are finalising the publication of the manuscript, and we expect to share it in full in the coming months.’
Alarming signals are being picked up all around the world but are being ignored by health chiefs and governments. In Scotland, concerned doctors presented figures to Public Health Scotland, an NHS board sponsored by the Scottish Government, that show a sharp spike in post-vaccination neonatal deaths (deaths that occur before a baby is four weeks old) from February 2021, the month they began jabbing pregnant women. The spikes in neonatal deaths increased with each subsequent vaccination and booster, reversing the trend of falling neonatal death rates. The same neonatal death trend was not seen during 2020, when covid infections went unchecked.
Post-neonatal deaths increased too. These are deaths of babies between the age of four weeks and one year. Again, the number of deaths increased the more vaccinations a pregnant woman received.
One gynaecologist who worked on the data said Public Health Scotland officials were poker-faced when presented with the alarming numbers. ‘They did not react at all, and no action was taken.’
Many countries are seeing a drop in birth rates as I reported for TCW here. Taiwan saw a 23.4 per cent drop in 2022, Hungary, Germany, Canada, Northern Ireland, and Switzerland all experienced similar reductions. By July 2, 2022, the European pharmacovigilance data collection system, EnduraVigilance, had received 3,304 reports of pregnancy and post-pregnancy problems; 100,087 reports of reproductive system and breast disorders, including nine deaths, were attributed to Pfizer, and 1,061 with 12 deaths attributed to Moderna. A total of 20,841 reproductive system and breast disorders, including nine deaths, was reported.
Turkish researchers have studied fertility in female rats and found a reduction in the sacs that hold the female’s eggs, called primordial follicles, by up to 60 per cent. Primordial follicles are the foundations of fertility: if they do not develop, women cannot ovulate, and pregnancy becomes difficult or impossible without medical help. Periods become irregular or may stop with early menopause.
The researchers, from eight Turkish medical institutions, gave 30 rats mRNA and non-mRNA vaccines equivalent to the dose adults receive. Results showed that both types of vaccine could impact the loss of primordial follicles.
Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher at the McCullough Foundation said: ‘This kind of damage to a woman’s lifelong egg supply is biologically irreversible. The loss of primordial follicles is permanent, they do not regenerate. If this applies to humans, it means early menopause, infertility and plummeting birth rates.’
A recent preprint study from Czechoslovakia shows successful conceptions in the country are plunging. Dr Vibeke Manniche, a Danish MD, and mathematician Dr Tomáš Fürst, Assistant Professor of Applied Mathematics at Palacky University in the Czech Republic, tried to get their study published. Dr Fürst said: ‘We were turned down by six scientific journals within two hours of submitting the paper for consideration.’
Their results, taken from official government data, show that in June 2021, unvaccinated women enjoyed an increase in successful conceptions which continued for the next six months. Throughout 2022, successful conception rates were 1.5 higher in unvaccinated women compared with vaccinated women. Overall, successful conceptions in vaccinated women were about a third lower than unvaccinated women. Again, there was no effect on successful conceptions during 2020, when covid infections were at their peak.
Dr Fürst said: ‘You don’t have to be Einstein to look for the cause. Many women were reporting irregular menstruation. It’s easy to connect the dots. Unfortunately, no country ever released birth data according to vaccination status apart from the Czech Republic.
‘We held a conference in our Parliament to present the data. All members of parliament were careful not to attend the seminar apart from opposition party members. This is because as members of the Association of Microbiologists, Immunologists, and Statisticians (SMIS), which I am co-founder, we have been labelled misinformation spreaders.
‘Mainstream media won’t report our work. The wall of censorship is firm. We’ve been deleted from Facebook many times. The truth will come out because the covid lies are so dense, they’ve overplayed their cards on such a massive scale, many people have awakened.’
